Ambiguous figures, attention, and perceptual content

reply to Jagnow

Bence Nanay

pp. 557-

I argued in Nanay 2010 that we cannot characterize perceptual content without reference to attention. Here, I defend this account from three objections raised by Jagnow 2011. This mainly takes the form of clarifying some details not sufficiently elaborated in the original article and dispelling some potential misunderstandings.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11097-011-9221-3

Full citation:

Nanay, B. (2011). Ambiguous figures, attention, and perceptual content: reply to Jagnow. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4), pp. 557-.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.