Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2009) Human Studies 32 (1).
Theorizing has been conceived historically in illuminative and ocular metaphors, and as an activity that occurs in a fixed and privileged relation to political society that permits a panoramic perspective. These elements of light, sight, and distance, are supportable existentially and ethically in post-war, post-Holocaust world. One of the first to explore the challenges to theorizing in this era was Albert Camus. He provided phenomenological and existential investigations of the obstacles to theorizing politics in his literary works, particularly his trilogy of novels: The Stranger, The Plague, and The Fall. In this paper, I offer a reading of these novels that isolates theorizing as an activity performed not from a transcendent perceptual vantage of perfect light and vision, but from the immanent perspectives achieved in the city, among friends, or by exile.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-008-9105-x
Full citation:
Robinson, C. C. (2009). Theorizing politics after camus. Human Studies 32 (1), pp. 1-18.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.