But language too is material!

Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen

pp. 169-183

Language is infused with materiality and should therefore not be considered as an abstract system that is isolated from socio-material reality. Expressions materialise language in social practices, thus providing the necessary basis for languaging activities. For this reason, it makes sense to challenge proponents of orthodox linguistics and others who hold that language can be studied in isolation from its concrete manifestations. By exploring the relation between materiality and linguistic activity, the article extends Malafouris' Material Engagement Theory (MET) while clarifying the phenomenon of "linguistic denotation'. In so doing, it critiques orthodox approaches to language which trace denotation to abstract meanings and/or mental representations. The article shows how the denotative aspects of language can be cashed out in non-representational terms and, furthermore, that the interrelation of denotation and materiality is crucial to human material culture in that it allows for material engagements to transcend localised contexts. These engagements become global in Latour's sense and, in so doing, denotation ceases to demand descriptions in terms of representations.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11097-017-9540-0

Full citation:

Gahrn-Andersen, R. (2019). But language too is material!. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (1), pp. 169-183.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.