Repository | Book | Chapter
(2016) Paradoxes of conflicts, Dordrecht, Springer.
The present contribution reexamines the thesis regarding the rationality of doxastic dialectics, an issue developed by us in several of our previous studies. This time our intention is to emphasize the paradoxical nature of the subjectivity (a premise grounding the belief), and to demonstrate that, in spite of this aspect, the above-mentioned thesis gets more subtle support, instead of being devaluated.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41978-7_14
Full citation:
Amel, R. (2016)., Petitio principii: with reference to doxastic/belief dialectics, in G. Scarafile & L. Gruenpeter Gold (eds.), Paradoxes of conflicts, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 207-218.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.