Repository | Book | Chapter

207561

(2015) The world according to Philip K. Dick, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Dick without the dick

adaptation studies and slipstream cinema

Mark Bould

pp. 119-136

Len Wiseman's $125 million Total Recall (US/Canada 2012) did not fare well with mainstream film critics. It was described as an "unnecessary remake,"1 "a near-total redundancy,"2 'sanitized [and] soulless,"3 "an unsubtle shoot-"em-up… set in a world that makes no sense,"4 "a long succession of repetitive chase scenes, hollow explosions and… speech balloon dialogue"5 and "the most ridiculous sci-fi film since Timecop".6 Not one of the dozens of reviews I have read even notices the film's politics: its setting emphasizes an impoverished migrant labor force and oppressive border controls; its plot hinges on a superpower faking a reason to wage asymmetrical imperialist war; and it concludes with the fall of a mighty tower that to the colonized signified imperial arrogance and force. However, it is not my intention to try to recuperate Total Recall as a misunderstood, countercultural classic; Wiseman's film is no such thing. Rather, I will use it to help sketch out some currents in contemporary adaptation studies before moving on to think about Dickian films not based on Philip K. Dick sources.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1057/9781137414595_8

Full citation:

Bould, M. (2015)., Dick without the dick: adaptation studies and slipstream cinema, in A. Dunst & S. Schlensag (eds.), The world according to Philip K. Dick, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 119-136.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.