Repository | Book | Chapter
(2018) Handbook of potentiality, Dordrecht, Springer.
The distinction between potentiality and actuality in Aristotle has its origin in Platonic ethics. In his psychological and ethical works Aristotle's notion of potentiality is embedded in a causal framework that is characteristic of life in general. A key theme is the distinction of various meanings of "to know". In his early work the possession of knowledge is distinguished from its use. In De anima Aristotle adds the potentiality for acquiring knowledge as characteristic of the genus human being. He argues that the stages of actualization of knowledge are instances of a more comprehensive biological and ethical development. Life is the fulfillment of soul as formal, efficient and final cause, with the potentiality of body as material cause. The unity of body and soul is derived from the causal nexus of potentiality and actuality, like a power and the instrument in which it resides. In such cases potentiality is complex and depends on numerous conditions. Failure of full realization may occur when any of the necessary conditions of the development and realization of the fulfillment of human life are lacking, whether in the environment (e.g. climate), the body (illness, drunkenness), or the soul (natural virtue, firm character, attention).
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1287-1_4
Full citation:
de Haas, F.A.J. (2018)., Potentiality in Aristotle's psychology and ethics, in K. Engelhard & M. Quante (eds.), Handbook of potentiality, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 71-91.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.