Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2013) Synthese 190 (15).
An argument for Trivialism, the view that natural languages are logically inconsistent, is provided that does not rely on contentious empirical assumptions about natural language terms such as “and” or “or.” Further, the view is defended against an important objection recently mounted against it by Thomas Hofweber.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-012-0136-5
Full citation:
Azzouni, J. (2013). Inconsistency in natural languages. Synthese 190 (15), pp. 3175-3184.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.