References
Darrell P. Rowbottom
(2019). Extending the argument from unconceived alternatives: observations, models, predictions, explanations, methods, instruments, experiments, and values. Synthese, 196 (10), 3947-3959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1132-y.
(2019). Scientific realism: what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions. Synthese, 196 (2), 451-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1484-y.
with Asay, J. (eds) (2019). Synthese 196 (2).
(2014). Aimless science. Synthese, 191 (6), 1211-1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0319-8.
(2014). Educational research as science?. In A. D. reid, E. Paul hart, & M. A. Peters (Eds.). A companion to research in education (pp. 145-153). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2013). Empirical evidence claims are a priori. Synthese, 190 (14), 2821-2834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0087-x.
(2011). Stances and paradigms: a reflection. Synthese, 178 (1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9524-x.
with Bueno, O. (2011). How to change it: modes of engagement, rationality, and stance voluntarism. Synthese, 178 (1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9521-0.
with Bueno, O. (2011). Stance and rationality: a perspective. Synthese, 178 (1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9526-8.
with Bueno, O. (eds) (2011). Synthese 178 (1).
(2010). Corroboration and auxiliary hypotheses: Duhem's thesis revisited. Synthese, 177 (1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9643-4.
with Bueno, O. (2009). Why advocate pancritical rationalism?. In Z. Parusniková, & R. S. Cohen (Eds.). Rethinking Popper (pp. 81-89). Dordrecht: Springer.