Repository | Book | Chapter
(1997) Hegel's phenomenology of spirit, Dordrecht, Springer.
The following response takes some questions prompted by Rose's paper as a starting point for a discussion of her work in general. I propose to repay the wit, imagination and intelligence of Rose's paper with a gift of one-sided and near-sighted objections.1 I wish to discuss four topics in particular: the relation between philosophy and the human and social sciences in Rose's work; the relation between the existential and the legal-political; the return of pathos to logos; and the separation of speculative from dialectical thinking.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-8917-8_11
Full citation:
Jarvis, S. (1997)., Idle tears a response to Gillian Rose, in G. Browning (ed.), Hegel's phenomenology of spirit, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 113-117.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.