Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(1997) Human Studies 20 (1).
Dialogic or dialogistic? dialogicity or dialogism?
a word of warning against rigor metodologiae
Matti Itkonen
pp. 47-58
Probing into the fundamentals of any phenomenon, we come upon a secret in the very moment of its inception - a bond with the multiplicity of the world. If anything in our world is detached from its foundations, this ontological lifeline is severed - being and Being are confounded. The ontic preexists language, it pre-empts all conceptualization. The world is in flux and lies always beyond the confines of any system; something of it always escapes. Only when this is conceded can beginning begin, only then can we set about the work of phenomenalizing our world; only then is it possible to seek answers to questions such as "Who am I?", "And you?", "What is the nature of responsibility, reflection, dialogicity and intersubjectivity?" Perhaps after all some notion can be netted in.
Publication details
Full citation:
Itkonen, M. (1997). Dialogic or dialogistic? dialogicity or dialogism?: a word of warning against rigor metodologiae. Human Studies 20 (1), pp. 47-58.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.