Repository | Book | Chapter
(2000) The tenseless theory of time, Dordrecht, Springer.
In Part I of our inquiry we wish to consider the principal arguments typically adduced on behalf of a tenseless or B-Theory of time. The reader may be surprised to find no mention of McTaggart's Paradox. This is because McTaggart's famous argument is, as I understand it, primarily an argument against the reality of tense and, hence, an A-Theory of time. Rather than being a positive demonstration of the B-Theory, it attempts to show the logical incoherence of the tensed theory and so is best considered as an objection to the A-Theory of time. Accordingly, I have discussed it as such in my companion volume The Tensed Theory of Time: a Critical Examination. In this volume we wish to consider arguments which seek to demonstrate more positively the truth of a B-Theory of time.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3473-8_1
Full citation:
Craig, W.L. (2000). SR and the B-theory, in The tenseless theory of time, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 3-34.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.