Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2012) Philosophy & Technology 25 (1).
In a recent publication in this journal, Asle Kiran and Peter-Paul Verbeek (hereafter K&V) argue that extension theory and the notion of trust it implies are flawed. In this commentary, I defend extension theory against their critique. I first briefly introduce extension theory, then reconstruct K&V's five arguments against extension theory and demonstrate that four of their five arguments are misplaced.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s13347-011-0035-6
Full citation:
Heersmink, R. (2012). Defending extension theory: a response to Kiran and Verbeek. Philosophy & Technology 25 (1), pp. 121-128.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.