Repository | Book | Chapter

225250

(1989) An intimate relation, Dordrecht, Springer.

Why thematic kinships between events do not attest their causal linkage

Adolf Grünbaum

pp. 477-494

There are strongly diverging diagnoses of the defects of psychoanalytic theory. In a paper on schizophrenia, the German philosopher and professional psychiatrist Karl Jaspers (1974, p. 91) wrote: "In Freud's work we are dealing in fact with [a] psychology of meaning, not causal explanation as Freud himself thinks". The father of psychoanalysis, we learn, fell into a "confusion of meaning connections with causal connections". After Jaspers, Paul Ricoeur has elaborated the patronizing claim that Freud basically misunderstood what he himself had wrought. As Ricoeur tells us in his book Freud and Philosophy (1970, p. 359), psychoanalytic theory is a hermeneutic enterprise, as opposed to a natural science: "psychoanalysis is an exegetical science dealing with the relationships of meaning between symptoms and repressed instinctual mentation".

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2327-0_24

Full citation:

Grünbaum, A. (1989)., Why thematic kinships between events do not attest their causal linkage, in J. Brown & J. Mittelstrass (eds.), An intimate relation, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 477-494.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.