Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2014) Synthese 191 (14).
Almost everyone agrees that many testimonial beliefs constitute knowledge. According to non-reductionists, some testimonial beliefs possess positive epistemic status independent of that conferred by perception, memory, and induction. Recently, Jennifer Lackey has provided a counterexample to a popular version of this view. Here I argue that her counterexample fails.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0443-0
Full citation:
Perrine, T. (2014). In defense of non-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony. Synthese 191 (14), pp. 3227-3237.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.