Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2014) Synthese 191 (5).
The predicate view on proper names opts for a uniform semantic representation of proper nouns like ‘Alfred’ as predicates on the level of logical form. Early defences of this view can be found in Sloat (Language, vol. 45, pp. 26–30, 1969) and Burge (J. Philos. 70: 425–439, 1973), but there is an increasing more recent interest in this view on proper names. My paper aims to provide a reconstruction and critique of Burge’s main argument for the predicate view on proper names, which is still used by several current philosophers in defence of this view. I have called this argument the unification argument. I will present a stepwise interpretation and reconstruction of this argument, consider several possible responses to it and defend a specific response to it in detail.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-013-0296-y
Full citation:
Rami, D. (2014). On the unification argument for the predicate view on proper names. Synthese 191 (5), pp. 841-862.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.