Replies

J. O'Regan

pp. 285-296

I reply to challenges raised by contributors to this book symposium. Key challenges include (but are not limited to): distancing my new account of reductionism-in-practice from my previous "new wave" account; clarifying my claimed "heuristic" status for higher-level investigations (including cognitive-neuroscientific ones); defending the "reorientation of philosophical desires" I claim to be required by my project; and addressing consideration about normativity.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11097-005-4074-2

Full citation:

Bickle, J. (2005). Replies. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3), pp. 285-296.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.

Cannot connect to DataBase