Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles

How to explain the contradiction between, on the one hand, the decline of teaching in contemporary history, which necessarily brings about the decline of the historical event “Shoah” itself, and, on the other hand, the ever more growing attention towards the memory of the genocide of the Jews? In the past year only, ten “trains of the memory” have left Italy to take more than fifteen thousand students to Poland — thereby making our country the third country in the world as for amount of visitors of holocaust sites. Under the sign of the “duty of memory” and of an approach to Shoah more and more devoted to human rights and to moral education, most teachers prefer to focus on the visit to the places of the massacre and on the testimonies of survivals, rather than on a historical and political reconstruction of the context and of the facts.Precisely because the narrator-victims are survivors of the lagers, they are the mediators between the dark of the obscene world that they were compelled to see, and the world of the listeners: they are the human visages of a universe of victims without a name, and their stories are the key for us to question our sense of responsibility. However, with no solid historical teaching, their narration elicits only a emotive participation, it provides the impression to have fulfilled a moral duty, but it remains, as a matter of fact, incomprehensible.

DOI: 10.4000/estetica.1747

Full citation: