Repository | Book | Chapter
(2009) Rethinking Popper, Dordrecht, Springer.
Popper claims that error indicates what to avoid and there is no recipe for how to proceed. Most rationalist philosophers ignore his arguments and still try to justify their views instead of trying to improve upon them by criticizing them and conjecturing alternatives. In public discourse barren forms of justification are widespread. More and better critical institutions are required, and these require political compromise on shared aims.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_17
Full citation:
Jarvie, I. (2009)., Popper's continuing relevance, in Z. Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 217-235.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.