Repository | Book | Chapter

205415

(2016) Academic autoethnographies, Rotterdam, SensePublishers.

Subject to interpretation

Rose Richards

pp. 163-174

Autoethnography taught me a great deal about my embodied experience of chronic kidney disease, research as an embodied act, and my stance as a researcher. As a methodology, it has long proven useful for a variety of research fields, not the least education (Hayler, 2011; Sparkes, 1996; Starr, 2010). In South Africa, autoethnography has been used to interpret experiences in the changing landscape of higher education (Grossi, 2006; Harrison, 2009) because it offers researchers a number of possibilities concerning identity and transformation work, including problematising traditional categorisations and old hierarchies.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-399-5_11

Full citation:

Richards, R. (2016)., Subject to interpretation, in D. Pillay, I. Naicker & K. Pithouse-Morgan (eds.), Academic autoethnographies, Rotterdam, SensePublishers, pp. 163-174.