Repository | Book | Chapter

205551

(2009) Postcolonial philosophy of religion, Dordrecht, Springer.

Max Müller and textual management

a postcolonial perspective

Sharada Sugirtharajah

pp. 159-170

The aim of this paper is to bring to the fore the hermeneutical presuppositions undergirding Max Müller's approach to the Veda. He constructs a textualized Hinduism which is informed by nineteenth-century notions of evolution, historicism, and comparative philology. He forges a non-ecclesiastical Protestant form of Hinduism which will eventually find fulfilment in Christianity. In other words, Müller fashions a Hinduism that suits his own hermeneutical assumptions — a Hinduism that has much to do with his own nostalgia for an uncontaminated European past. What he offers is a Veda that is still locked in its infancy, needing the help of the evolved European culture. The Veda has glimpses of truth but these are those of a child and should be treated as such.First, a brief word about postcolonialism 1 Postcolonialism is one of the latest theoretical categories to enter academic discourse. Each discipline has come up with its own definition of postcolonialism and has appropriated it to suit its own academic needs. Postcolonial theory has been used in many different ways — as a methodological approach, as a resistant or oppositional strategy, or as a discursive category. As with any critical category, postcolonialism is not without limitations, but nevertheless it is a highly serviceable category. The aim of postcolonial criticism is to interrogate textual, historical, ethnographic, visual and other representations of societies which were badly affected by the historical reality of colonial presence and domination. It is about how colonizers constructed images of the colonized, as well as how the colonized themselves made use of these images as a counter-tool to combat negative portrayals and to construct a new identity. Postcolonial theory is useful in that it reveals the link between knowledge and power and between representation and mediation, and highlights homogenizing, essentializing and universalising tendencies in varied discourses, reading and interpretative strategies. I will mainly use postcolonialism as a hermeneutical tool to interrogate Max Müller's construction of Hinduism. This chapter 2 will look at Müller's treatment of the Veda, under the following three theoretical categories: colonial patronage, trope of the child and classification.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2538-8_9

Full citation:

Sugirtharajah, S. (2009)., Max Müller and textual management: a postcolonial perspective, in P. Bilimoria & A. B. Irvine (eds.), Postcolonial philosophy of religion, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 159-170.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.