Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="226644"
(2001) The importance of time, Dordrecht, Springer.
I am very grateful to Quentin Smith and Michael Tooley for their very thoughtful comments on my paper. They raise many issues, and I shall only attempt to address some of them here, and augment my original argument at one or two points. First, it may be helpful if I clarify the strategy of my paper.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3362-5_24
Full citation:
Le Poidevin, R. (2001)., Reply to Smith and Tooley, in L. N. Oaklander (ed.), The importance of time, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 285-291.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.