Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2017) Synthese 194 (11).
The question of whether cognition requires representations has engendered heated discussion during the last two decades. I shall argue that the question is, in all likelihood, a spurious one. There may or may not be a fact of the matter concerning whether a given item qualifies as a representation. However, even if there is, attempts to establish whether cognition requires representation have neither practical nor theoretical utility.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0646-4
Full citation:
Rowlands, M. (2017). Arguing about representation. Synthese 194 (11), pp. 4215-4232.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.