Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2007) Synthese 154 (2).
When is an argument to be called one-sided? When is putting forward such an argument fallacious? How can we develop a model for critical discussion, such that a fallaciously one-sided argument corresponds to a violation of a discussion rule? These issues are dealt with within ‘the limits of the dialogue model of argument’ by specifying a type of persuasion dialogue in which an arguer can offer complex arguments to anticipate particular responses by a critic.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-005-2882-0
Full citation:
van Laar, J. A. (2007). One-sided arguments. Synthese 154 (2), pp. 307-327.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.